The Enduring Pursuit of Light

By: Editorial

Freemasonry, a fraternity tracing its roots to medieval stonemasons’ guilds, stands as the world’s oldest secular fraternal organization still in existence.

Its rich history is not merely a chronicle of events, but a fascinating narrative of transformation, intellectual pursuit, and an unwavering commitment to moral and social improvement.

From its practical origins as an operative craft to its flourishing as a speculative and philosophical institution, Freemasonry has continuously evolved, adapting to changing times while holding fast to its core principles.

This article delves into the pivotal moments that shaped modern Freemasonry, exploring its educational mission, the critical role of civility, the depth of its ritual and symbolism, and how it has navigated various challenges to remain a beacon of wisdom and brotherhood.

From Operative Guilds to Speculative Brotherhood: The Great Transformation of 1717

Before the dawn of modern Freemasonry, the Craft was primarily comprised of “operative” masons—working builders engaged in constructing edifices according to architectural principles known to them.

These guilds, much like Roman Colleges of Artificers, admitted non-operative individuals of rank and influence, often referred to as Gentlemen or Theoretic Masons, who served as patrons and members.

This practice ensured protection from governmental interference and fostered connections with church dignitaries, who were often deeply involved in building projects. While the term “speculative Freemasons” gained widespread use only after 1717, the concept of non-operative members existed much earlier, with records showing admissions of “men of various professions” into the Order as early as 1646.

However, by the early 18th century, operative Freemasonry in England faced a decline in prestige and numbers, partly due to the decadence of Gothic Architecture.

Architectural skill waned, geometrical secrets were lost, and the distinction between Freemasons and “rough layers” blurred. In London, only four operative lodges remained in 1716.

Within these lodges, a growing number of educated “Theoretic” or “Speculative” members began to see an opportunity to transform the fraternity. They envisioned an association where the fraternal spirit would be the primary bond, and the symbolic teachings of architecture would be applied to the science of morality.

This ambition led to a significant shift from a “club of workmen” to a “club of moralists”.

The pivotal year was 1717. On St. John Baptist’s day, June 24th, members of these four London lodges, along with “some old brothers,” convened at the “Goose and Gridiron Ale-house” in St. Paul’s Churchyard.

This followed a preliminary meeting in February 1717 at the “Apple Tree Tavern,” where they resolved to organize a Grand Lodge. At the Goose and Gridiron, they elected Mr. Anthony Sayer, Gentleman, as the first Grand Master, marking a clear step towards a speculative, rather than operative, leadership.

This event is often called the “Revival of Freemasonry,” but Masonic scholars argue it was more accurately a “radical change” or “new invention”—a “gradual transition from an old into a new system”.

Prior to 1717, lodges operated under their own authority, guided by “Ancient Charges” or Rolls; there were no Grand Masters or Grand Lodges as we understand them today. The organization of the Grand Lodge introduced a new system where new lodges would require a warrant from the Grand Master and the Grand Lodge to be deemed “regular or constitutional”.

This crucial regulation, formally established by Grand Master Payne in 1720 and approved in 1721, solidified the shift from an operative to a purely speculative institution. The four original lodges, however, were exempted from this warrant requirement, deriving their authority from “immemorial usage”.

The early Grand Lodge itself evolved from a mass-meeting of the Craft to a representative body composed of the Masters and Wardens of particular lodges, along with Grand Lodge officers, a change formally established around 1721.

The initial officers, while including some carpenters and stonecutters, increasingly leaned towards “persons of rank, of influence, or of learning,” marking the complete victory of the speculative element by 1723.

This transformation severed Freemasonry from its practical building origins and solidified its identity as a “purely Speculative, philosophical, and moral institution”.

The Cornerstone of Instruction: Evolution of Masonic Education

From its earliest known forms, education has been a fundamental purpose of Freemasonry. Initially, Masonic education relied heavily on memorization and catechisms, serving both instructional and recognition purposes.

The Edinburgh Register House ritual from 1696, for instance, featured a fifteen-question catechism. Sir Christopher Wren, around 1685, introduced a concise “catechismal formula” called an “Examination,” which was quick and simple, covering questions like “What is a Mason?” and “Where were you made a Mason?”.

These early catechisms often took place in “table lodges,” with the Master posing questions to the Wardens or circulating them among the brethren.

The content included practical aspects of operative craft alongside moral tenets, symbols, and legends like the “letter G” and the “Master Mason’s Word”. Even later, William Preston’s Ritual of 1777 formalized learning by dividing degrees into sections and clauses to aid memory.

The establishment of the Grand Lodge in 1717, coinciding with the Age of Enlightenment, spurred a significant shift in Masonic education. The emphasis moved towards “good Conversation, and the consequent Improvements” as the “principal Motive” for joining and propagating the Craft.

This reflected a broader societal trend where science and reason gained prominence, and the transmission of knowledge and intellectual debate became a perceived duty.

Formal lectures became a key educational component, noted in Grand Lodge minutes as early as December 1721 for making communications “very entertaining”.

By 1726, London lodges commonly featured lectures on “some point of geometry or architecture” at every meeting. Lodge minutes from 1733-1743 show a diverse range of topics, including human physiology, ethics, architecture, industrial processes, scientific inventions, art, history, and mathematics, demonstrating a clear shift towards varied intellectual pursuits beyond just the operative craft.

Influential figures played a crucial role in developing Masonic education. Robert Samber’s “Long Livers” (1722) was the first recorded Masonic essay, and Martin Clare’s 1735 discourse was the first American Masonic oration.

Later, Wellins Calcott (1769), William Preston (1772), and William Hutchinson (1774) published lectures that explained the symbols of the Craft, with Preston’s Illustrations of Masonry significantly shaping rituals in the United States.

William Preston notably defined Masonry as “The study of science and the practice of virtue” and its object as “To rectify our conduct by its sublime morality; to render us happy in ourselves and useful to society”.

Preston asserted that the “Groundplan of Masonry” is “Instruction,” and while a wise man seeks knowledge, a wise Mason “will do more, for he will never rest till he finds it,” and “will travel to find it,” journeying “from the farthest extent of the West” to “the farthest extremity of the East”. This signifies a profound and continuous pursuit of wisdom.

The development of dedicated Masonic periodicals and journals emerged in the late 18th century, such as Journal für Freymaurer (1784) and Freemasons’ Magazine (1793), covering not only Masonic topics but also broader cultural, scientific, and general news.

Early interest in Masonic history is evident with Sir Robert Moray being asked to write a history of Freemasonry in 1664. The establishment of specialized research lodges like Quatuor Coronati No. 2076 in 1884 and the Philalethes Society in 1928 further solidified a new era of systematic Masonic scholarship.

Today, Masonic lodges continue to emphasize lectures, papers, philosophical discussions, and research. Progression through degrees often requires candidates to demonstrate proficiency through presentations, active participation, memorization, and self-improvement, reinforcing the continuous pursuit of knowledge as a core Masonic value.

The Art of Civility: Cultivating Harmony in the Lodge

A crucial aspect of early Grand Lodge Freemasonry, inextricably linked with its educational mission, was the cultivation of civility and harmonious conversation.

Martin Clare, a London schoolmaster, Fellow of the Royal Society, and prominent Freemason, delivered an influential oration in 1735 titled “A Discourse on Good Behaviour for the Guidance of the Members of the Craft“. This speech, which was repeated by popular demand and published, provided significant insights into the expected conduct within Masonic lodges.

Clare asserted that the “chief Pleasures of Society”—”good Conversation” and the “consequent Improvements”—are the “principal Motive” for joining and propagating the Craft. He believed Freemasonry offered these advantages better than any other society, provided members upheld the Order’s foundation of “indissoluble Friendship” and “Brotherly Love”.

Clare emphasized that true civility was not merely an outward facade, but an “inward Civility of the Mind”. This internal disposition, expressed through “outward Demeanor,” entailed “a general Good-will, that decent Regard, and personal Esteem, for every Man”.

It was about a man’s moral dimension manifesting in his behavior, aiming to avoid making others uneasy. A remarkable 56.4% of Clare’s oration was either adapted or paraphrased from John Locke’s Some Thoughts Concerning Education, particularly sections on civility and behavior.

This demonstrated Clare’s intellectual background as a schoolmaster and his respect for Locke, a fellow of the Royal Society, suggesting that his educated Masonic audience would likely have recognized the source.

Clare specifically warned against four “destructive traits” that disrupt the “Harmony of Conversation” and contradict “Social Virtues”:

Natural Roughness (Rusticity): A lack of deference or regard for the feelings of others, indicating indifference to pleasing or offending. This was characterized as the mark of a “Clown,” even in well-dressed individuals.

Contempt: An “entirely averse” attitude to good breeding, where disrespect causes “Uneasiness and Pain.” Clare stated there was no room for outright contempt among brethren.

Censoriousness: A “Disposition to find Fault with Others,” which included:

Raillery (friendly joking): Though seemingly refined, it could make the ridiculed person feel uneasy, prompting Clare to recommend “wholly abstain[ing]” from it due to the risk of hurt feelings.

Contradiction: An “ill-breeding” behavior. While necessary for truth and charity to oppose “ill-grounded Opinions,” it must be done with “proper Caution” and “gentlest Manner” to avoid humiliating others.

Interrupting others while speaking: A “great Fault” and significant rudeness that shows “no ordinary Degree of Disrespect,” implying weariness of the other’s discourse.

Captiousness: The tendency to “seize upon supposed faults or willfully and artificially take exception,” raising objections to be disagreeable. Clare stressed that one angry person could “discompose a whole Company,” undermining “Peace, Ease, and Satisfaction,” which are the “very Soul of Conversation”.

Clare connected civility to the deeper purpose of Freemasonry, presenting the lodge as an “emulation of the holy Temple of Solomon”. Masons are “Lovers of Order” and “Successors” to the builders of Solomon’s Temple, whose business is “to reduce all rude Matters to Truth”.

The harmony and quality of conversation in the lodge were essential for Masons to live up to their ideals and gain “pearls of wisdom”.

Proper conduct ensured that the Craft was governed by “good, wholesome, and dispassionate Laws,” that Grand Lodge business ran smoothly, and that “true Masonry will flourish”.

This also helped those outside the fraternity recognize the “substantial Pleasures” and “greater Advantages” of an orderly Masonic society.

Ritual, Symbolism, and the Pursuit of Profound Truths

At its heart, Freemasonry describes itself as a “beautiful system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols”. The core of Masonic ritual consists of the three Craft degrees: Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, and Master Mason.

Candidates are progressively initiated, passed, and raised, learning the meanings of Masonic symbols and being entrusted with secret knowledge, including passwords, signs, and grips. These ceremonies are described as “part allegorical morality play and part lecture”.

The symbolism in Freemasonry is primarily drawn from the tools of operative stonemasons, such as the square and compasses, the level and plumb rule, the trowel, and the rough and smooth ashlars, with moral lessons attributed to each.

The dramatic allegorical ceremonies revolve around the construction of King Solomon’s Temple and the story of its chief architect, Hiram Abiff.

The concept of Masonic brotherhood stems from a 16th-century legal definition of “brother” as one who has taken an oath of mutual support. Masons take an obligation in each degree, often upon a Volume of Sacred Law, such as the Bible, which is appropriate to the individual’s religious beliefs.

Beyond the commonly taught meanings, Masonic symbolism invites a deeper, philosophical, and esoteric interpretation. For instance, the rough and perfect ashlars are used symbolically to represent the process of self-improvement and “breaking off those rough edges of ourselves” by “keeping our passions within due bounds”.

Some Masonic scholars connect these symbols to broader esoteric traditions. For example, the concept of the “middle pillar” that the Entered Apprentice represents upon entering the lodge is linked to Kabbalah’s “Tree of Life” and the “Pillar of Equilibrium”.

The “Secret 9s” found in the ritual are also said to align with Kabbalistic principles and the “Ankh” hieroglyph from ancient Egyptian mysteries.

The pursuit of understanding these deeper meanings is central to the Masonic journey, as Albert Pike, a prominent Masonic scholar, asserted: “Masonry is a search after Light. That search leads us directly back, as you see, to the Kabbalah”.

This implies that Masonic education extends beyond rote memorization to a profound inquiry into universal truths and philosophical underpinnings.

Enduring Challenges and Future Pathways

Throughout its history, Freemasonry has faced significant criticism and opposition, both religious and political. Anti-Masonry, defined as “opposition to Freemasonry,” comes from various sources, including religious organizations (Catholic Church, some Protestant denominations, certain Islamic countries) and political groups.

The Catholic Church, for example, has a long history of objections, stemming from the perception that Masonry teaches a naturalistic deistic religion in conflict with Church doctrine, leading to multiple papal pronouncements and even excommunication in the past.

Protestant objections often center on allegations of mysticism, occultism, or Satanism, while some Islamic anti-Masonic arguments are tied to antisemitic conspiracy theories.

Politically, Freemasonry has been suppressed by authoritarian regimes, including Nazi Germany, Francoist Spain, and former Communist states.

In 1799, English Freemasonry narrowly escaped being banned by the Unlawful Societies Act in the wake of the French Revolution, only gaining exemption after Grand Masters explained the Craft’s support for lawful authority and charitable work.

The “Morgan Affair” in 1826 led to an Anti-Masonic movement in the United States, and later, the Propaganda Due (P2) lodge scandal in Italy further fueled distrust.

Modern Freemasonry in some regions, such as the United Kingdom and mainstream U.S. Grand Lodges, has experienced a significant decline in membership since the mid-20th century.

For instance, the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) saw its memberships ( note; many members hold multiple memberships )  fall from 500,000 in the 1960s to approximately 150,000 in 2024.

However, this is not a universal trend; for example, the Grand Orient de France has shown remarkable growth, emphasizing its Liberal philosophical approach centered on freedom of conscience, social progress, and intellectual inquiry.

Despite these challenges, Freemasonry demonstrates a capacity for adaptation and evolution. The traditional concept of “Exclusive Jurisdiction” in the United States, which once prevented recognition of Prince Hall Grand Lodges (historically African-American), has evolved into a “shared jurisdiction” model, reflecting social progress while maintaining mutual recognition.

The UGLE, while maintaining male-only lodges, officially acknowledged the legitimacy of women’s Masonic orders in 1999 and now collaborates with them on charitable projects.

Furthermore, UGLE guidance in 2018 explicitly welcomed transgender members, affirming that “A Freemason who after initiation ceases to be a man does not cease to be a Freemason”.

Leaders within Freemasonry emphasize the importance of understanding its history and the sacrifices made by past members. Grand Master Charbel T. Fahed of Washington, D.C., stresses that Freemasonry was “born in blood” and that appreciating this history helps members understand why the Craft is so special, preventing lodges from becoming “mere social clubs”.

He advocates for continuous learning through his “Triple E” banner: Education, Empathy, and Ethics.

The concept of the “Go-Giver” is also highlighted as a core Masonic value, emphasizing that “it is in giving that one receives” and that benefiting others ultimately benefits oneself.

This outward-looking focus on charity and serving mankind is essential for the Craft’s continued positive influence.

By embracing its rich past, committing to intellectual and moral development, and actively engaging in service to humanity, Freemasonry continues its journey, striving to remain a relevant and inspiring force for personal and societal betterment.

The Square Magazine Podcast

The Square Magazine Podcast